Arguement "Graffiti is A Way Of Art"

Claim

• Graffiti is a way street artist express there feelings.

Evidence

• Not all graffiti artistt are the same some aren't artist at all, they are gangbangers.

Commentary 1. There is a difference between gangbangers and graffiti arist by the way there use a spray can in a positive or negative way.

Commentary 2. Graffiti artist try to convince gangbangers who can graffiti good to use graffiti in a positive way not negative way.

• Graffiti is simply another way of art, just done without permission.

Commentary 1. Just because graffiti is on walls, trains, street signs, sidewalks, and any other possible public place, doesnt mean it's not art, it's just the artist expressing him/herself.

Commentary 2. Gaffiti may not always be readable do to the artist style but it is always colorful and catches people attention.

Opposing Claims/They say

• It defaces public or private property that is not there's.

My Rebuttal/I Say

• A graffiti artist will place graffiti anywhere to get there name out.

My Thinking:
This paragraph is based mainly dedeuctive thinking because of the fact that are presented.

My paragraph:
Graffiti is a way street artist express there feelings.Not all graffiti artistt are the same some aren't artist at all, they are gangbangers.There is a difference between gangbangers and graffiti arist by the way there use a spray can in a positive or negative way.
Graffiti artist try to convince gangbangers who can graffiti good to use graffiti in a positive way not negative way.Graffiti is simply another way of art, just done without permission.
 Just because graffiti is on walls, trains, street signs, sidewalks, and any other possible public place, doesnt mean it's not art, it's just the artist expressing him/herself. Gaffiti may not always be readable do to the artist style but it is always colorful and catches people attention.
 It defaces public or private property that is not there's.
A graffiti artist will place graffiti anywhere to get there name out.